Musings on the End Time Church Module

.... I try to write out the articles on this blog in advance and post them periodically, arrenged by subject. But in concluding this module about the end time church (and before beginning another,) I’d like to offer some musings of my own, to re-cap some issues that came up in the course of the module and to talk about some other things that are important to me.
.
The Parable of the Ten Virgins
.
.... In the parable of the ten virgins, what do the virgins represent? (Matthew 25:1-13) The best suggestion is that they represent individual Christians, and in that manner our modern denominations are represented by them as well.
.
.... But Berry raises another interesting question. Remember that all ten of the virgins slumbered and slept (vs 5). But is it possible that another, smaller remnant did not sleep? They would be represented by the voice at midnight, who remained alert and appeared to be a watchman of sorts: (Matthew 25:6).

.... "The burden of Dumah. He calleth to me out of Seir, Watchman, what of the night? Watchman, what of the night? The watchman said, The morning cometh, and also the night: if ye will inquire, inquire ye: return, come."

(Isaiah 21:11-12 KJV)

.... "And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand . . ."

(Romans 13:11-12)

About Parables (in General)
.
....The question has been also raised of how deeply we can go into a parable for informa- tion that still bears interpreta- tion. Some Christians believe they can only be viewed in the broadest terms, perhaps at the overall conceptual level, like a moral. While I agree there are lessons to be learned at that level, I also believe we can go much deeper. Jesus went into greater detail in interpreting them, for example, which ought to prove the basic point that further interpretation is possible as we go deeper (Matthew 13:18-23; 36-43). The question, then, is how deeply may we go?
.
.... Jesus said we must give an account for every idle word that we speak, so there is something in His character that attaches significance to even this level of detail in the message we communicate (Matthew 12:36). Therefore it is consistent with that part of His character to offer us the same (see Matthew 5:18). This is a glimpse into the character of Jesus Himself, so I consider it definitive. Therefore, I believe there is significance to even the most subtle nuance of His parables.
.
.... The Bible foretold that Jesus would teach us through these conceptual stories: "I will open my mouth in a parable; I will utter dark sayings of old, which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us." (Psalm 78:2-3). Based on the last clause of this passage, the parables of Jesus actually contain no new information. They only took the elusive meanings of the Old Testament, which foretold the kingdom of God, and put them into a new form that was much easier to contemplate. In that sense, His parables were both new and old at the same time, and ancient secrets were illuminated through them:
.... "Therefore every scribe instructed concerning the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who brings out of his treasure things new and old."
(Matt 13:52; see also v 35)
.... Parables are designed for comparisons between a type and an anti-type, but they can also be compared with the original, OT passages they were designed to illuminate. To preserve the correlation between prophecy and fulfillment requires a much stricter line of interpretation, which helps us get them right (see 1 Cororinthians 2:13).
.
.... The continutity between a parable's apparent and ultimate meaning is found at the conceptual level. Concepts are the middle step between head knowledge and a true, spiritual understanding, and Jesus wants us to actually muse and contemplate on these truths in order to cultivate this approach and obtain its ultimate spiritual benefit. But He also knew we would have problems with this: that our hearts were dull and that our ears were hard of hearing. So whenever a parallel, spiritual understanding could be obtained, He challenged the dullness of our ears by saying:

"He who has ears to hear, let him hear!"

Greek Expert Needed
.
.... Everything Jesus said or did was foretold in the Messianic prophecy (Amos 3:7). Since 1980, I have been working on a book that compares the prophecy and the fulfillment at a minute level of detail. The format I’ve chosen is like a reference edition Bible. The gospel is offered in simple story form, just as one would read the gospels in the New Testa- ment; and if the reader has a question at any point, a cross-reference to the OT perspective is provided (he can then look it up). This allows the Bible to speak for itself in exploring the life of Jesus, but it also created a problem:
.
.... In order to promote continuity and avoid redundancy, I needed one account of the life of Jesus as a basis for these comparisons. This account would have to contain every detail, so that even the most subtle nuance would not be missed (He who has ears to hear, let him hear). Therefore I have harmonized the four gospel accounts into one. The four accounts flowed together so perfectly that I believe God intended this to be done one day (and everyone else who has attempted a gospel harmony has reached the same conclusion).
.
.... The gospel harmony looks great in English, and it even works out in the original Greek, as far as I can tell, for as deeply as I am able to go. But I think a true Greek expert is needed to check this out in the original language and make sure. In fact, in the end, this part of the project may require an interlinear version of the harmony in the original Greek. Is anyone interested and able to help? I would prefer someone in the Tulsa area if possible, but beggars can’t be choosers.
.
.... By the way, the purpose of this book is two-fold. Originally it was designed as a tool for Jewish evangelism and it has always kept that purpose in view. But it proved to be a wonderful resource for the church as well because it illuminated the mind of Christ in greater depth. Through the OT prophecy, God expressed intentions; and when Jesus came, He acted on those intentions. A natural correlation exists between prophecy and fulfillment, and it helps us understand His thoughts in a dynamic way. To explain this by another parable: when we look at something with one eye, we'll see the picture clearly enough. But two eyes will give us depth perception.
.
.... To settle the question of the book's usefulness, and also to offer a challenge, please remember that the church was in existence for about thirty years before any of the New Testament was written. Early Christians had the eye witness testimony of the apostles, and their first ‘New Testament’ was the Messianic prophecy (Eph 2:20). The dual testimony of apostles and prophets was something the first century church understood very well, having comparred it carefully at each word, as they looked at God's intention and the fulfillment in Jesus; yet almost all later generations have known little or nothing about it. So hopefully one day this book will help revive that original perspective and become an important resource for seeking the Knowledge of Christ more fully.
.
Congratulations, you have now completed the End time Church Module! To return to the main blog, please click here.

1 Comments:

  • loren said...
    One more thought on parables. Some Christians believe they can only be viewed in the broadest terms, at the overall conceptual level, like a moral. But in explaining His parables, Jesus seems to be saying that we can go as deeply as our appetite for Him will take us:

    And the disciples came and said to Him, "Why do You speak to them in parables?"

    He answered and said to them, "Because it has been given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given.

    "For whoever has, to him more will be given, and he will have abundance; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him.

    "Therefore I speak to them in parables . . ." (Matt 13:10-13)

    I once attended a Sunday School class on the parables of Jesus that was meant to be a fairly easy course. But I was really shocked to see how so many of the class members just did not have a clue about what they meant. Not a clue; they absolutely did not get it, even though most of them were older Christians. The teacher was a friend of mine and I'm sure he was equally amazed to see this in them.

    It was then that I realized just how true those words of Jesus' were. Our ability to understand the parables really tells the tale of our walk with Him.

    4/10/2005 10:24 AM


    Unchained Slave said...
    Loren,
    I really appreciate the End Time Church module.

    I agree that Jesus is our role model. If we are to be held accountable for every idle word, then it is (as you suggest) not a ‘reach’ to conclude that Jesus never spoke an idle word.

    Jesus quoted Deuteronomy 8:3 in Matthew 4:4, “But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’” “every word” is a big statement. We even see a prime example of Jesus not engaging in small talk in John 8:3-11. He wrote on the ground instead. (One of the questions I want to ask when I get to heaven is what He wrote.)

    That fact, conclusion being sound, we must examine His parables.
    We must search what they say, what they mean, their applications, and their concepts. We need to look at them deeply. As your comment about the Sunday School points out, many do not have a clue. This would present an interesting (sad) paradox. If (correct me if I am wrong here - you are the SME on the Gospels) roughly half of the recorded Words of Jesus are parables - then if we do not know the parables, we do not know half of Christ…

    AT the same time, we need to avoid a pitfall very evident in ‘the church’ today. That is, we cannot allow ourselves to develop a doctrine or theology based solely on a concept from parables. [This is an especially prevalent pattern in ‘prosperity preachers’.]

    I really like that comment, “Our ability to understand the parables really tells the tale of our walk with Him.”

    In Christ,

    4/21/2006 3:53 PM


    Cleopas said...
    Hi David,

    Wow, I read your comments to Nancy and they are stunning. The 'every word' quotation was great! The comment on knowing Jesus through the parables was a searching, penetrating observation.

    Parables, of course, are subject to interpretation, but I have always thought that the Bible was a self-interpreting book. When some sort of imagery is given there, it will be explained elsewhere. Offhand, I can't think of any exceptions to this.

    Oh yes, on the incident with the woman caught in the act of adultery. I have a theory. The first time Jesus stooped to write with His finger, I think He was writing out the ten commandments (as in Exodus 31:18). Basically by this He is saying to the Pharisees, 'All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Which of these have you failed at?'

    When they refuse to see the point, He stands up and states the same point plainly. "He who is without sin . . ."

    Now He stoops down to write, to complete the thought. They have asked Him to be a swift witness and He is showing them what that is like. he is writing their names beside the commandments they, themselves, have violated. I am more sure on this one because it fulfills a prophecy:

    "Those who depart from Me shall be written in the earth, because they have forsaken the LORD, the fountain of living waters."
    (Jer 17:13)

    And thanks for the encouragement; the glory be to God.

    4/23/2006 5:44 PM


    Unchained Slave said...
    Loren,
    What a penetrating observation about what He wrote in John 8:3-11. I never made the correlation between that passage and Exodus 31:8 or Jeremiah 17:13.

    A couple of additional observations. John 8:9a “Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last.” They left in that order because the oldest had more sins on their conscience. That would coincide with your assertion of the Commandments & their names…

    The extension of Jeremiah 17:13 - the names written in the earth will be destroyed when the earth is destroyed, such is their destiny at judgement.

    I would rather have my name written in the Book of Remembrance, “Then those who feared the Lord spoke to one another, And the Lord listened and heard them; So a book of remembrance was written before Him For those who fear the Lord And who meditate on His name.” Malachi 3:16

    In Christ,

    4/24/2006 2:59 PM


    Cleopas said...
    Hi David,

    Amen, those are some wonderful thoughts! I like what you said about the Book of Life! And I caught what you said about the context of judgment. It really puts everything in perspective.

    Actually, this whole story has a strong profile when compared to the Old Testament prophecy. Here's some further observations:

    In the beginning, the scribes and Pharisees caught this woman in the adultery. It appears that the man had already been stoned, as by the law of Moses prescribed; but before the accusers could stone the woman, one of them got an idea. Why not use this as an opportunity to test Jesus? They suddenly saw the possibilities and were glad, and their hearts entirely changed in the matter. So the woman was brought to Jesus with a crafty new intention.

    An occasion had presented itself, and Jesus’ character was revealed in a complete response to the adultery, the Pharisee's attitude toward the woman, and their attitude toward Himself.

    Let's begin with the case of adultery. According to Malachi, Jesus would be a swift witness against adulterers because they do not fear Him (Mal 3:5; Heb 13:4). Moses, in the Law, had commanded stoning them -- a penalty which Jesus upheld for another crime, which was also based on the law of Moses (Mark 7:10; Ex 21:17; Deut 21:18-21). Therefore in principle, the law of Moses could not have been His point of objection. Had the matter not been further complicated, the woman well may have been stoned.

    But now we must include the attitude of the scribes and Pharisees toward the woman, and toward Jesus Himself. These were the complicating factors. Rather than grieving over her sin as they ought, they had become bloodthirsty; they were glad, because it gave them an opportunity to test Jesus (1 Cor 5:2; 2 Cor 12:21; John 8:5). Three types of conflicts were produced through this:

    First, their attitude toward the adultery affected Jesus’ own attitude in the matter: “The LORD abhors the bloodthirsty and deceitful man.” So He would not have cooperated with their initiative under such false motives (Psalm 5:6).

    Second, their attitude affected His stance toward the woman: “Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and do not let your heart be glad when he stumbles; Lest the LORD see it, and it displease Him, and He turn away His wrath from him.” Prov 24:17-18). Because of their improper attitude concerning the woman, Jesus set His heart on delivering her.

    Third, Jesus would address their attitude toward Himself by catching the wise in their own craftiness (Job 5:13).

    In the course that He chose, Jesus would bring their counsel quickly upon them. Let us return to the story itself:

    In response to their call for judgment, Jesus remained silent. He had examined their premise, the law of Moses, and had found it to be true; yet He also found their manner of application to be objectionable. So He accepted their premise, and sought a way of catching them in their own craftiness.

    Next we see that Jesus stooped, and wrote with His finger on the ground, which we've discussed. He probably wrote the ten commandments - the very premise which the scribes and Pharisees refer to.

    Yet in writing this, Jesus had a broader focus, motivated by love, which would also include her accusers. He wanted them to understand that all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, which even includes them. With the same measure they judge, they will be judged; and is this the way they want their own judgment to be handled? With bloodthirsty motives and shrewdness? Even for His enemies therefore, a Divine motivation of love, in its eternal perspective, was about to be shown.

    His adversaries did not understand. With hardened hearts they persisted. Jesus therefore arose to declare His meaning to them plainly: “He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.” (John 8:7). Then He stooped again to the ground, and continued writing, as we discussed.

    Judgment begins with the house of God, and the scribes and Pharisees now perceived His intention quite clearly. Being convicted by their own conscience they departed, one by one, until Jesus and the woman were left alone. But He still had to deal with the matter of her adultery.

    “Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no man condemned you?”
    “No one, Lord.”
    “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.”

    The woman’s sin had required the death penalty and Jesus had accepted this premise; furthermore He remained a swift witness against an adulteress, and He cannot deny Himself (Mal 3:5/Heb 13:8). Yet He had also determined in His heart to deliver her. So what had just transpired?

    According to the same law of Moses, no one could be put to death on the testimony of a single witness. Two or three witnesses were required for the death penalty, and the others had already departed, seemingly unheard (John 8:9x6). Justice demanded, therefore, that the charges be dropped -- and in this manner the woman was set free (Deut 17:6).

    But even so, Jesus did not let her go without correction. By telling her “Sin no more,” He implies that her sin is known, and that account will one day be made of it -- unless she brings forth fruit to repentance. He also offers her hope by this, that she may yet learn to stand when the Day of Judgment has come. That beacon of hope, which returns sinners to the path of life, is called by Him ‘the light of life’.

    4/24/2006 9:32 PM


    Bhedr said...
    In agree and in fact believe the parables unlocked the truth itself. God does not miss a beat. Remember he told his disciples to gather up the fragments after they fed the multitude?

    5/30/2006 12:01 AM


    Cleopas said...
    Hi Brian,

    Excellent observation, and perfectly consistent with His character.

    5/30/2006 9:25 AM

    By Blogger Cleopas, at 7:47 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home